USPTO serial 79105900
TEXTRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4284363Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2013
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEXTRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine P. James
Christine P. James Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800Atlanta, GA 30309-4528UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for installing, positioning, programming and testing radio frequency identification labels, namely, [ weaving machines, knitting machines, thread rolling machines, shedding machines, Jacquard machines, warping machines, cutting machines, cutting-out machines, folding machines, process machines, thermo-setting machines, takeup machines, wind-up machines, ]machines for presentation, packaging, bundling and labeling of textiles and machines for label converting, machines for label assembly, machines for label finishing, machines for label testing; machines for manufacturing electronic chip modules and antenna wires; accessories for weaving machines, [ knitting machines, thread rolling machines, shedding machines, Jacquard machines, warping machines, cutting machines, cutting-out machines, folding machines, process machines, thermo-setting machines, take-up machines, wind-up machines, ] machines for presentation, packaging, bundling and labeling of textiles and for machines for label converting, machines for label assembly, machines for label finishing, machines for label testing, and for machines for manufacturing electronic chip modules and antenna wires, namely, drives, knives and cleaning machines therefore | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Blank electronic chip modules and electronic chip modules encoded with electronic numbers and antenna wires for textile radio frequency identification labels; electronic apparatus, namely, computers and electrical controllers for monitoring, checking and controlling installation machines and textile machines; [ apparatus, namely, computer workstations comprised of computer hardware, optical scanners, computer interfaces, and computer network interface devices for data processing systems and software for electronic programming units for creating textile patterns and antennas in the nature of computer aided design software for weaving and knitting machines; ]computer software for monitoring, checking and controlling radio frequency identification installation machines and software for textile machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 023 | Textile antenna wires, namely, conductive threads for textile use, textile wires, synthetic fibre thread and yarn, elastic thread and yarn for textile use, yarn and thread for textile purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TexTrace AG
- Other trademarks owned by TexTrace AG
- Other trademarks owned by TexTrace AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Similar marks named TEXTRACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 18, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |