USPTO serial 79105920
RED V
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4290613Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2013
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with RED V?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MILANO, IT
I-20121 MILANO, IT
I-20121 MILANO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER; GOODS MADE OF LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER, NAMELY, PURSES, [ SCHOOL BAGS, SCHOOL SATCHELS, ]BUSINESS CARD CASES, [ TRAVELING TRUNKS, BACKPACKS, RUCKSACKS, ]WALLETS, SHOPPING BAGS, [ ATTACHÉ CASES, ] BEACH BAGS, BAGS, TRAVELING BAGS, HANDBAG FRAMES, POUCHES [, BRIEFCASES; LEATHER CASES, UNFITTED VANITY CASES, LEATHER KEY CASES, SUITCASES, BAGS FOR SPORTS, HAT BOXES OF LEATHER, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, LEATHER SHOULDER BELTS, LEATHER STRAPS, FUR PELTS, RAW SKINS, DOG COLLARS, CLOTHING FOR PETS, UMBRELLAS, WALKING STICKS; WHIPS, SADDLERY, HARNESS FITTINGS ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | [ CLOTHING, NAMELY, OVERALLS, UNDERWEAR, SWEATERS, SHIRTS, JUMPERS, SUITS, TROUSERS, COATS, SKIRTS, PETTICOATS, PULLOVERS, OVERCOATS, JACKETS, STUFF JACKETS, SKI JACKETS, SKI PANTS, PARKAS, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, PANTS, DRESSING GOWNS, FORMAL DRESSES, VESTS, JERSEYS, PAJAMAS, BATHROBES, BRASSIERES, CAMISOLES, CORSELETS, SLIPS, LAYETTES, BATHING CAPS, BATHING SUITS, LEOTARDS AND TIGHTS FOR GYMNASTICS, RAINCOATS, WATERPROOF PANTS AND RAIN BOOTS, MASQUERADE COSTUMES; ] FOOTWEAR, [ SLIPPERS, BATH SLIPPERS, ] BOOTS, SPORT BOOTS, [ HORSE-RIDING BOOTS, GALOSHES, ] SHOES, BEACH SHOES, SANDALS, SPORT SHOES, GYMNASTIC SHOES [, OVERSHOES; HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS, CAPS, CAP PEAKS; SOCKS, SOCK SUSPENDERS, STOCKINGS, GARTERS, GLOVES, MITTENS, MUFFS, SHAWLS, TIES, NECKTIES, SCARVES AND FOULARDS, VEILS, BANDANAS, FUR STOLES, BELTS; WEDDING DRESSES ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 11, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 19, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |