Drawing for PROCOM

USPTO serial 79105972

PROCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Atkins

ELIZABETH ATKINS LATHROP & GAGE LLP230 PARK AVENUESUITE 2400NEW YORK, NY 10169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Antennas; signal processors in the nature of filters for electronic signal transmissions, including duplex filters, multiplex filters, band-pass filters, high-pass filters and low pass-filters; combiner components in the nature of amplifiers for professional radio networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 28, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2014MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 11, 2014ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 14, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 19, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 10, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 5, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 26, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 26, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 26, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 26, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance