Drawing for SARMATA WYJATKOWA POLSKA SARMATA

USPTO serial 79106270

SARMATA WYJATKOWA POLSKA SARMATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4259701Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2012
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SARMATA WYJATKOWA POLSKA SARMATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Ave., Suite 101tmdocketing@honigman.comBloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, spirits and vodkaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 29, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 29, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 19, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 18, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2012CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 13, 2012CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 5, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance