Drawing for TRITEC

USPTO serial 79106371

TRITEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4228421Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2012
Examiner
ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TRITEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Valves as machine components, not for land vehicles; hand-operated hydraulic and pneumatic butterfly valve actuators; sheet rings for valves as machine components, not for land vehicles; hand-operated hydraulic and pneumatic actuators for opening and closing valvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 3, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 2, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 9, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 27, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 21, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 23, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 27, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 24, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance