Drawing for RENTSCH PARTNER

USPTO serial 79106913

RENTSCH PARTNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4270274Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2013
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RENTSCH PARTNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dianne M. Smith-Misemer

Dianne M. Smith-Misemer Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Boulevard, Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035[ Business management; business administration, namely, business administration assistance, business administration and office work, business administration and management; providing office functions; business consultation for companies and in organizations; business management, namely, recording, management and processing of data and information for businesses ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038[ Telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone services, telecommunications by email, personal communication services; telecommunication services, namely, electronic collection, provision and transmission of data and messages; services in connection with a data bank, namely, transmission and reception of database information to and from databank users via the telecommunication network ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research and design relating thereto in the field of computer engineering and design utilized in intellectual property consulting; industrial analysis and research services in the field of computer hardware and software utilized in intellectual property consulting; [ design and development of computers and software; engineers' services, namely, engineering services; ] computer specialists' or scientists' services, namely, creation of technical or scientific drawings in the nature of engineering drawing services as well as scientific and technological project study and research services in the field of intellectual property consulting, information and consulting with respect to new technologies in the field of computer engineering and design utilized in intellectual property consultingACTIVE—
045Legal consulting and representation, particularly in the field of intellectual property law, copyright, competition law, licensing law and company law; legal services of a legal or patent attorney; [ granting of intellectual property licenses; ] consultancy in respect of intellectual property law, namely, consulting in the field of intellectual property licensingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 13, 2023INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 18, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 18, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 16, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 2, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 26, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 18, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 26, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 18, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 18, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 8, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 3, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 1, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance