Drawing for MHQ

USPTO serial 79106956

MHQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4340403Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 28, 2013
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MHQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ursula B. Day

Ursula B. Day Law firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal tubing; hollow profiles of metal; steel frame structures for building; metal building materials, namely, steel tubes for the steel construction industry and the mechanical engineering industry; structural hollow sections for the steel construction industry and the mechanical engineering industry; steel joists and girders for building; junctions of metal for pipes; all the aforesaid goods being coated or sheathed to protect against damageSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Pipes and hollow profiles of metal, being parts for machines and therefrom, namely, rollers for conveyor belts, cylinders, hollow spindles warp beams and bobbins for weaving and dying machines, rolling tool supports, press chamber tubes and axle tubes for bailing presses; shaft couplings other than for land vehicles; metalworking machines, namely, machining centersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Contract manufacture, for others, of pipes of metal, steel frame structures for building and metal building materials; treatment of materials, namely, welding and coating of steel structures; metal treatment; providing material treatment informationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 18, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2020C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 26, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 28, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 28, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 30, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 7, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance