Drawing for THE EDITOR

USPTO serial 79107036

THE EDITOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE EDITOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas R. Vigil

THOMAS R. VIGIL THOMAS R. VIGIL319 BLUFF COURTLAKE BARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials, namely, all purpose carrying bags, holdalls, handbags, rucksacks, trunks and travelling bags, key cases, wallets, purses, make-up bags sold empty, umbrellasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing for men, women and children of textile or material of all kinds, namely, skirts, trousers, shorts, jeans, shirts, blouses, jerseys, sweaters, T-shirts, vests, suits, tracksuits, cloaks, coats, overcoats, bomber jackets, tunics, jackets, anoraks, raincoats, stockings, socks, hats, headgear, namely, hats caps and visors, scarves, gloves, neckties, swimsuits, belts, shoes, beach shoes, slippers, boots, gymnastic shoes, tennis shoes, bath robes, tights, underwear, sportswear, namely, sweat pants and sweatshirtsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 8, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 16, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 21, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance