Drawing for PILOTCAR

USPTO serial 79107287

PILOTCAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILOTCAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES PLLC1314 TEXAS AVE21ST FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicle seats, head supports for motor car seats, safety seats for children in vehiclesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2014MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 15, 2014ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 15, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 2014OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 29, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 4, 2013OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2013OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 18, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2012LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 28, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 10, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance