USPTO serial 79107290
IC CONSULT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IC CONSULT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Sparschu
Mark S. Sparschu Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; computer software consultancy; design and development of electronic data security systems and technical consultancy relating thereto; programming of internet security programmes; IT security services for protection against illegal network access; IT access, authorisation, authentication, encryption, identification and digital certificate services; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; IT system integration services and implementation of network programs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |