Drawing for KRYSTAL

USPTO serial 79107317

KRYSTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4184859Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2012
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRYSTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law

Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law BINDEROW LAW OFFICES1330 Camino Del MarSuite 250Del Mar, CA 92014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ BICYCLE COMPUTERS; DEVICES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENTS, IN PARTICULAR, KNEE GUARDS, ARM PROTECTORS, AND BODY PROTECTORS SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF CLOTHING FOR PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENTS; PROTECTIVE HELMETS, IN PARTICULAR BICYCLE HELMETS; SPECTACLES, IN PARTICULAR CYCLING GOGGLES ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
012[ LAND VEHICLES, IN PARTICULAR ] BICYCLES * NOT INCLUDING MOTORIZED * [ AND TWO-WHEELED MOTOR VEHICLES WITH AUXILIARY MOTORS ]; PARTS AND * FITTINGS * COMPONENTS FOR BICYCLES [ AND TWO-WHEELED VEHICLES WITH AUXILIARY MOTORS ], IN PARTICULAR BICYCLE FRAMES, HANDLEBARS FOR BICYCLES, BICYCLE SADDLES, BICYCLE FORKS, BICYCLE BRAKES, BICYCLE BELLS, BICYCLE HANDLE BAR STEMS, [ BICYCLE SEAT POSTS, ] BICYCLE CRANKSETS, CONSISTING OF A SPROCKET AND A CRANKARM, BICYCLE PEDALS, BICYCLE GEAR SHIFTS, BICYCLE WHEEL HUBS [, BICYCLE TIRES ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 4, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 13, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Mar 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 7, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 13, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 2, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 19, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 19, 2013PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2013CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 18, 2013LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 18, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 14, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 1, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 14, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 3, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 7, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2012COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Aug 14, 2012PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2012LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 29, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance