USPTO serial 79107349
PIXUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIXUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |