Drawing for EMMA

USPTO serial 79107409

EMMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4220036Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2012
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Roppel

Andrew Roppel Holland & Hart LLPPO Box 8749Attn. Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs and computer software of a marine vessel for monitoring, evaluating and managing the energy usage of a marine vessel to improve energy efficiency and to minimize fuel costs and emissionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042consulting services in the fields of energy measurement to improve energy efficiency on marine vessels; research in the field of energy, namely, research regarding energy measurement and energy consumption on marine vessels; design of computer hardware, computer software, data management platforms, industrial automation controls, and measurement instrumentation in the field of energy measurement and energy consumption on marine vessels; scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research and analysis in the field of energy measurement and energy consumption on marine vesselsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 1, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 6, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 5, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 10, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 10, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 9, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 30, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 4, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 9, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 8, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 5, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance