Drawing for OCEAN BANK

USPTO serial 79107550

OCEAN BANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCEAN BANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking; financing services; guarantees (provided by bank); trusteeship (provided by bank); saving money services (provided by bank); safe deposit services (provided by bank); exchanging money; financial management; leasing-purchase financing; issuance of credit cards; credit card services; electronic payment services; financial consultancy; financial evaluation (insurance, banking, real estate); real estate management; leasing real estate; real estate brokersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 22, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 16, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance