Drawing for NANUK

USPTO serial 79107673

NANUK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NANUK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean R. Karau

DEAN R KARAU FREDRIKSON & BRYON PA200 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer; mineral and aerated waters and lemonades; soda water; table waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making fruit drinks and lemonadesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2014IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 22, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 22, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 22, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 22, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 5, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 2, 2012OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2012OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jun 26, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 9, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance