Drawing for BERG PROPULSION

USPTO serial 79107730

BERG PROPULSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERG PROPULSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Propulsion mechanisms other than for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Screw (propellers) for ships; steering gears for shipsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 12, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 15, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 1, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 25, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 28, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance