Drawing for ENERGY EFFICIENCY 2 E

USPTO serial 79107838

ENERGY EFFICIENCY 2 E

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4336683Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 21, 2013
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ENERGY EFFICIENCY 2 E?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, gear cutting machines, [ gear lapping machines, worm grinding machines for grinding gears, rotor grinding machines and machine tools for metal working, power operated metal working machine tools, namely, metal milling tools, gear cutting machines, milling cutter heads, stick blades for gear cutting; ] machines and the tools thereof for grinding toothed wheels, namely, gear grinding machines [ and power operated grinding wheels and replacement parts, namely, cups and disks; knife grinding machines; toothed wheels for machines, namely, spur gears, bevel gears, worm gears ]ACTIVE—
009Electric and electronic apparatus and instruments for regulating and controlling machines for metal working, namely, numerical control apparatus for moving and controlling the movement of axes of such machines [, electric and electronic motor controls for controlling motors of machines and machine tools for machining of metals ] ; [ calculating machines, data processing apparatus and computers for regulating and controlling machines for metal working, namely, data processor-based and ] microprocessor-based numerical axes controls and motor controls; electronic measuring apparatus, namely, gear testing apparatus [ and measuring centers in particular for testing and measuring toothed wheels, namely, spur gears, bevel gears, worm gears, and machine tools for metal working, namely, metal milling tools, gear cutting tools, cutter heads, stick blades for gear cutting, and ball bearings ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 7, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 29, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 28, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 20, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 21, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 20, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 13, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 3, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance