USPTO serial 79107872
GOOD FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOOD FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jan Tamulewicz
JAN TAMULEWICZ KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP575 MADISION AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pastry products; bakery products; Cereal preparations, namely, fiber flakes, high fiber cereal bars, fiber crisp breads, rice cakes, and breakfast cereal; candy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GOOD FOOD PRODUCTS SPÓLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
- Other trademarks owned by GOOD FOOD S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GOOD FOOD PRODUCTS SPÓLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GOOD FOOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |