Drawing for GIRAFFE

USPTO serial 79108011

GIRAFFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIRAFFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurants (including self-service restaurants), restaurant services; preparation and provision of food and drink; preparation of meals for consumption off the premises; restaurant services incorporating licensed bar facilities; snack bars, wine bars and cafe bars; provision of venues for parties or meetings; room hire servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 8, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance