USPTO serial 79108216
USH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JP
JP
JP
JP
JP
JP
JP
JP
JP
JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Spectacles (eyeglasses and goggles); goggles for sports; contact lenses; sunglasses; swimming face masks; swimming goggles; pince-nez; ordinary spectacles; dust protective goggles and masks; parts and accessories for spectacles; containers for contact lenses; spectacle temples; pince-nez mountings; pince-nez chains; pince-nez cords; spectacle cases; spectacle chains | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atelier cinq co., ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by TOYAMA Yuichi
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named USH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |