USPTO serial 79108405
MQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4266265Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2013
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of images and sound, data processing equipment and computers; ] computer software for data acquisition, data logging and data recording | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | [ collection and delivery of messages by electronic transmission; rental of telecommunications equipment, namely, message delivery apparatus; transmission of messages and images by means of computer; Internet service provider services, namely, collection and provision and transmission of information, texts, drawings and images concerning goods and services; e-mail data services; paging services ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ design and programming of Internet pages for on- and offline presences; Internet related services, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for providing access to texts, graphics, audio visual and multimedia information, documents, databases and computer programs in the nature of Internet-tools for data acquisition, data logging and data recording; maintenance, design and updating of computer software ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cluetec GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Cluetec GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Cluetec GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MQUEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 25, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 25, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |