USPTO serial 79108424
M MILLUTENSIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4252160Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2012
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with M MILLUTENSIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Presses, namely, hydraulic presses; ] die and mould spotting presses, namely, try-out presses; die-splitters, namely, die-stamping machines; [ material handling machines, namely, stackers; ] metal working machines, namely, decoilers, straighteners, [ roll feeds, power-operated shears; lifting trolleys, namely, hydraulic lift tables; ] metal working machines, namely, felt lubricators for sheet metal; [ metal working machines, namely, lubricators with brush roller for sheet metal; ] metal working machines, namely, spray lubricators for sheet metal; conveyor lines; [ punching systems, namely, punching presses for metal working; ] metal working machines, namely, cutting lines for sheet metal; metal working machines, namely, cut-to-length lines for sheet metal; metal working machines, namely, slitting lines for sheet metal; metal working machines, namely, feeding lines for sheet metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |