Drawing for SCRAMBLEGRAPH

USPTO serial 79108427

SCRAMBLEGRAPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4181505Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2012
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCRAMBLEGRAPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC700 E. Maple RoadSuite 450BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Holograms containing encoded information, not visible to the naked eyeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 23, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 17, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 30, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 28, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 7, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2012FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 31, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance