USPTO serial 79108553
INTALOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4430409Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2013
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTALOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita E. Kline
Rita E. Kline Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP1300 East Ninth StreetSuite 1700Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Roof coverings, not of metal, namely, green roofs composed of sand/soil bags, connector clasp, barbed clasp, reinforced grid, anchor bolt and expansion screw for the purpose of energy conservation and emission reduction, environmental protection and project greening; building materials, not of metal, namely, vertical green structures composed of sand/soil bags, connector clasp, barbed clasp, reinforced grid, anchor bolt and expansion screw for the purpose of energy conservation and emission reduction, environmental protection and project greening; building materials not of metal, namely, green slopes composed of sand/soil bags, connector clasp, barbed clasp, reinforced grid, anchor bolt and expansion screw for the purpose of energy conservation and emission reduction, environmental protection and project greening; building materials, not of metal, namely, facings composed of sand/soil bags, connector clasp, barbed clasp, reinforced grid, anchor bolt and expansion screw for the purpose of energy conservation and emission reduction, environmental protection and project greening; luminous paving materials, not of metal, namely, blocks, bricks and stone pavers; building materials, namely, glass granules for road marking; splice plates, not of metal, for connecting soil and the surface of buildings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |