Drawing for KAAS

USPTO serial 79108642

KAAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods (not included in other classes) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plasticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035The bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods (excluding the transport thereof), enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods; retail servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 29, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 20, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 29, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 29, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 29, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance