USPTO serial 79108864
MUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, for use in ballet, particularly, ballet shoes; point shoes, particularly ballet shoes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |