Drawing for ADIRA

USPTO serial 79109475

ADIRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4646997Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 2, 2014
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ADIRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore Lucas & Mercanti, LLP100 S. Jefferson Road, Suite 202Whippany, NJ 07981United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, sheet metal working machinery, laser cutting machines, hydraulic press brakes for machines, power operated shears, robotized bending cells and automatic, namely, press brakes with robotic bending cells; machine tools, namely, machine tools for transforming sheet metal; hand-held tools, other than hand-operated and tools parts of machines, namely, power operated hand-held tools for working sheet metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 9, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 10, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 20, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2025PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Mar 3, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 12, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 4, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 2, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 16, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 2, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 16, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 20, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Dec 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance