Drawing for ARISTOCRAZY

USPTO serial 79109537

ARISTOCRAZY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4259783Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2012
Examiner
ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARISTOCRAZY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Peter Spies

R. Peter Spies Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Soaps for body care; ] perfumery, [ essential oils, ] cosmetics [ hair lotions ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 7, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 18, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 14, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 14, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 26, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 26, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 26, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 25, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 12, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 16, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 18, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 12, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 8, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 8, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 5, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance