USPTO serial 79109569
DEKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4277774Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2013
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Hollander
Andrew J. Hollander K&L Gates LLP1 Newark CenterNewark, NJ 07102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Seal devices, namely, flexible boots, primarily non-metal watertight cones, closures, namely, polymer closures, and watertight or hermetic unfitted covers in the nature of insulating material, all for sealing roof penetrations and roof-mounted elements; seal devices in this class, incorporating a resilient component or components, namely, polymer closures to effect an air and/or watertight seal; seal devices in this class, for use in sealing about a member extruding through as aperture in another member, namely, primarily non-metal sealing rings for use as connections seals; non-metal pipe connectors, non-metal joiners for use in plumbing and construction, non-metal pipe fittings and accessories for non-metal pipe connectors, non-metal pipe joiners, and non-metal pipe fittings, namely, rubber flashings, pipe connectors, grates and covers, sealing strips and polymer closures; sealing or waterproofing products made from a polymer material for use in building, namely, polymer closures to effect an air and/or watertight seal; all of the foregoing specifically excludes goods that are used to build decks, or are designed or adapted for use with decks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 1, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |