Drawing for CRS

USPTO serial 79109574

CRS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Silicium (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); polycrystalline silicon (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); chips (integrated circuits); cell switches (electricity); vacuum tubes (radio); photovoltaic cells; transformers (electricity); circuit breakers; relays, electric; inverters (electricity); instrument transformer; sensor; fuse protector; bus duct; lightning conductors; accumulator boxes; anode batteries; galvanic cells; solar batteries; integrated circuitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 8, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 13, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 19, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance