Drawing for BIOMAR

USPTO serial 79109609

BIOMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4228465Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2012
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BIOMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric T. Fingerhut

Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Animal feed, namely, fish feedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 8, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 20, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 23, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 27, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 23, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 24, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance