Drawing for XCC

USPTO serial 79109698

XCC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4284416Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2013
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XCC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy P. Naill

Timothy P. Naill Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren P.C.2215 Perrygreen WayRockford, IL 61107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals, unwrought or semi-wrought, and their alloys; alloys of common metal, namely, metal/ceramic composite material in the nature of an alloy intended for the manufacture of reinforced foundry parts; special steels and steel alloys, refractory steels, stainless steels, highly alloyed special steels for resistance to wear and tear, shocks, heat and corrosion, and metal castings in the nature of cast parts made of these steels and alloys, namely, crusher hammers, cooler grates, cones crusher parts and teeth for cutter heads used in the dredging industry; unwrought or semi-wrought cast iron, alloys of cast iron, highly alloyed special cast irons for resistance to wear and tear, shocks, heat and corrosion, and metal castings in the nature of cast parts made of these cast irons and alloys, namely, crusher hammers, cooler grates, cones crusher parts and teeth for cutter heads used in the dredging industry; fireplace grates in the nature of sinter strand grates, [ valves of stainless steels other than parts of machines, ] special metal plugs; alloys of common metal, namely, metal/ceramic composite material intended for the manufacture of reinforced foundry parts; metal castings in the nature of grinding elements of metal/ceramic alloy for industrial grinders, namely, [ grinding balls, grinding rods, ] grinding rollers, grinding tables and [ grinding beads ] made of metal/ceramic alloy for use in milling processes [ ; metal chains for furnaces ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 5, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 7, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 6, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 5, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 29, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 18, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance