Drawing for MERMELADA

USPTO serial 79109744

MERMELADA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4359553Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 2, 2013
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERMELADA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paulette R. Carey

PAULETTE R. CAREY BUCHMAN LAW FIRM, LLPSTE 200510 THORNALL STEDISON, NJ 08837

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 2, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 7, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 7, 2020C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 2, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2014FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 2, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 21, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 17, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance