USPTO serial 79109766
VODKA AS IT SHOULD BE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2013
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with VODKA AS IT SHOULD BE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Closed joint-stock company with; 100 per cent foreign investments; "ROUST INCORPORATED"
RU
Closed joint-stock company with; 100 per cent foreign investments; "ROUST INCORPORATED"
RU
Closed joint-stock company with; 100 per cent foreign investments; "ROUST INCORPORATED"
RU
Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
Huenenberg, CH
Other trademarks owned by Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Purdue
David C. Purdue Purdue Law Offices, LLC2735 N Holland-Sylvania RdSuite B-2Toledo, OH 43615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Vodka | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Closed joint-stock company with; 100 per cent foreign investments; "ROUST INCORPORATED"
- Other trademarks owned by Closed joint-stock company with; 100 per cent foreign investments; "ROUST INCORPORATED"
- Other trademarks owned by Closed joint-stock company with; 100 per cent foreign investments; "ROUST INCORPORATED"
- Other trademarks owned by Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named VODKA AS IT SHOULD BE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 18, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |