USPTO serial 79109771
PROCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |