Drawing for MEIZU

USPTO serial 79109860

MEIZU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4287316Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2013
Examiner
KELLY, AMY C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEIZU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dominic P Madigan

Dominic P Madigan McCandlish Holton PC1111 East Main Street, Suite 1500Richmond, VA 23219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer system design; computer software design; industrial design; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer software upgrade; technical research in the field of information technology; computer programming; hosting computer web sites; design of interior decor in Class 42SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 17, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 16, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 13, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 2, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 13, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance