USPTO serial 79109860
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dominic P Madigan
Dominic P Madigan McCandlish Holton PC1111 East Main Street, Suite 1500Richmond, VA 23219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer system design; computer software design; industrial design; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer software upgrade; technical research in the field of information technology; computer programming; hosting computer web sites; design of interior decor in Class 42 | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |