Drawing for ZDC

USPTO serial 79109985

ZDC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZDC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripheral devices; data processing apparatus; computer peripheral devices; recorded computer software; computer programs, namely downloadable software; network communication equipment; anti-interference devices; intercommunication apparatus; transmitters of electronic signals; recorded computer programmesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 15, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 25, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance