Drawing for ATA

USPTO serial 79110331

ATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4374045Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 30, 2013
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Shotgun, handgunSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 3, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 24, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 30, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2013AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 7, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 9, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2012SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance