Drawing for SMART-CHART

USPTO serial 79110397

SMART-CHART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4303244Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 19, 2013
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SMART-CHART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

Terrence J. McAllister Ruggiero McAllister & McMahon LLCOne Landmark Square18th FloorStamford, CT 06901-2682

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Measurement and checking devices as well as devices for the controlling of metal-cutting machine or robots, ] Measuring apparatus and measuring instruments, namely, gloss meters and color meters [ and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, namely, calibrating devices for calibrating gloss meters and color meters; data processing apparatus and computers and parts and fittings thereof, namely ] , subprograms and program modules for controlling machines and robots which test and measure appearance and structure, especially color, gloss and surface characteristics of paints, lacquers, coatings and varnishes, tools in the nature of measuring appearance and structure, especially color, gloss and surface characteristics of paints, lacquers, coatings and varnishes [, and interface programs ; prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring comparative reference data for quality control purposes; ] all of the aforesaid goods are for measurement and quality control of color, gloss and other surface characteristics influencing the appearance of an objectACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 2, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 17, 2024INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 28, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 28, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 27, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 18, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 5, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 26, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 14, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 8, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance