Drawing for NLS

USPTO serial 79110495

NLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4293975Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2013
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yoon S. Ham

Yoon S. Ham LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal junctions for pipes; metal flanges; pulley of metal not machine elements; springs of metal not machine elements; valves of metal not machine elementsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Loading arms, namely, robotic arms for industrial purposes; butterfly valves being machine elements not for land vehicles; shafts, axles or spindles being machine elements not for land vehicles; bearings being machine elements not for land vehicles; shaft couplings or connectors being machine elements not for land vehicles; power transmissions and gearing for machines not for land vehicles; shock absorbers being machine elements not for land vehicles; springs being machine elements not for land vehicles; brakes being machine elements not for land vehicles; valves being machine elements not for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 23, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 17, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 23, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 17, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 22, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 26, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 14, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance