Drawing for SERVOLUTION

USPTO serial 79110554

SERVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4412621Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 8, 2013
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirk M. Miles

Kirk M. Miles The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electro-medical and medical apparatus and instruments, namely, ventilator systems comprised of ventilators, nebulizers for respiratory therapy, respiratory monitors and diagnostic modules thereforSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Updating of computer software; quality control for others; rental of computer software; installation of computer software; installation of software for computer systems; consultation and support services, namely, computer programming and computer system analysis; maintenance of computer software; technical support regarding computer software, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; rental of computer hardware and computer peripherals; computer software consultancy; development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 22, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 8, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 8, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 1, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2012ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2012LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 28, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 6, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 5, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance