USPTO serial 79110566
TRISELECTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4362735Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2013
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TRISELECTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ali-mohammad shariati moghaddam
0000091459 Navin Safron Building, IR
Ali-mohammad shariati moghaddam
0000091459 Navin Safron Building, IR
Ali-mohammad shariati moghaddam
0000091459 Navin Safron Building, IR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Lee D'Amore
Elizabeth Lee D'Amore LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP100 South Jefferson RoadSuite 202Whippany, NJ 07981Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Saffron for use as food seasoning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ali-mohammad shariati moghaddam
- Other trademarks owned by Ali-mohammad shariati moghaddam
- Other trademarks owned by Ali-mohammad shariati moghaddam
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TRISELECTA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 13, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |