Drawing for NEOX

USPTO serial 79110904

NEOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4259810Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2012
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy P. Naill

Timothy P. Naill Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren P.C.2215 Perrygreen WayRockford, IL 61107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals, unwrought or semi-wrought, and their alloys; alloys of common metal, namely, metal/ceramic composite material in the nature of an alloy intended for the manufacture of reinforced foundry parts; special steels and steel alloys, refractory steels, stainless steels, highly alloyed special steels for resistance to wear and tear, shocks, heat and corrosion, and cast parts made of these steels and alloys, namely, cooler grates used in the gravel pit industry; unwrought or semi-wrought cast iron, alloys of cast iron, highly alloyed special cast irons for resistance to wear and tear, shocks, heat and corrosion, and cast parts made of these cast irons and alloys, namely, cooler grates used in the gravel pit industry; [ fireplace grates in the nature of sinter strand grates, ] valves of stainless steels other than parts of machines, [ special metal plugs; ] alloys of common metal, namely, metal/ceramic composite material intended for the manufacture of reinforced foundry parts; grinding elements of metal/ceramic alloy for industrial grinders, namely, [ grinding balls, grinding rods, ] grinding rollers, grinding tables and grinding beads made of metal/ceramic alloy for use in milling processes; [ metal chains for furnaces; ] * none of the aforesaid goods containing carbon black or coatings containing carbon black *SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 22, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 18, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 7, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 7, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Oct 31, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 11, 2018715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 11, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 12, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 12, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Sep 12, 2013PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2013LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 28, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 18, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance