Drawing for MIXMO

USPTO serial 79110916

MIXMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4277796Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2013
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIXMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Carlin and Kristen S. Ruisi

John D. Carlin and Kristen S. Ruisi VENABLE LLP1270 Avenue of the Americas, 24th Fl.Rockefeller CenterNew York, NY 10020

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Vending machine; automatic vending machines for dispensing portioned quantities of sweets and other dry productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030[ Confectionery, namely, confectionery made of sugar, frozen confectionary and fondants; sweets; caramels; chocolates; pralines; snack and natural confectionery made from cereals, nuts and dried fruit, namely, yogurt-covered fruit, yogurt-covered nuts and cereal-based snack foods; coffee; tea ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 22, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 5, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 14, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 1, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 201971.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 8, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 18, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 18, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance