USPTO serial 79110927
ROSAPRIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4405092Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2013
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ROSAPRIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anita B. Polott
Anita B. Polott Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural products not included in other classes, namely, natural plants and flowers; ornamental and edible fresh roses, not processed | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Advertising relating to flowers; business management relating to flower growing; marketing of fresh flowers via direct sales and on websites; business administration relating to flowers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Agricultural advice; [ Agricultural services, namely, compost spreading; ] [ Agricultural services, namely, planting, growing, fertilizing, pruning and picking roses for others; Forest habitat restoration; ] horticultural services [ ; Providing information regarding plant and flower identification for horticultural purposes ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERBASA CIA LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by INTERBASA CIA LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by INTERBASA CIA LTDA
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ROSAPRIMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 14, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2021 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |