Drawing for SBL.

USPTO serial 79110944

SBL.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4244164Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2012
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SBL.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin King

Justin King WPAT, PC8230 Boone Blvd. Suite 405Vienna, VA 22182UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006SCREWS OF METAL; METAL SCREW RINGS; PEGS OF METAL; METAL BOLTS; NUTS OF METALACTIVE—
007FITTINGS OF METALWORKING MACHINES, NAMELY, PRECISION BEARING LOCK NUTS, PRECISION SCREWS, MACHINE TOOL SPINDLES; METALWORKING MACHINES, NAMELY, BORING MACHINES, PERFORATING MACHINES, MILLING MACHINES, LATHING MACHINESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 25, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 24, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 29, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 6, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 17, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 11, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance