Drawing for UPRIGHT

USPTO serial 79110974

UPRIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4340426Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 28, 2013
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UPRIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine A Rittenhouse

Jeannine A Rittenhouse IPHORGAN Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Rd.Suite 125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Scaffolding, scaffold systems and scaffold assemblies, all of metal and their alloys comprised of tubular frameworks for assembling into scaffolds, made of metal; building materials, namely, work platforms, ladders, work decks in the nature of work platforms and catwalks in the nature of work platforms and structural parts of metal scaffolding, namely, castors, stands, towers, stairways, platforms, stages and staging, all made of common metal; tubular frameworks for assembling into scaffolds, made of metal; building materials, namely, work platforms, ladders, work decks in the nature of work platforms and catwalks in the nature of work platforms, castors, stands, towers, stairways, platforms, stages and staging, all made of common metal and for use in scaffolding systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019[ Building materials, namely, scaffolding boards and work platforms, not of metal, and structural parts for the aforesaid goods ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037[ Repair and installation of scaffolding and buildings; rental of construction equipment, scaffolding, scaffold systems and scaffold assemblies and apparatus; erection and dismantling of scaffolding and scaffold systems; advisory and consultancy relating to the aforesaid ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 28, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 30, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 15, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 15, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 3, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 6, 2019PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Apr 24, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 28, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 28, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 11, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 14, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance