USPTO serial 79111061
GREEN VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4263025Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2012
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RU-193230 Saint Petersburg, RU
RU-193230 Saint Petersburg, RU
RU-193230 Saint Petersburg, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander S. Lazouski
Alexander S. Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin TerraceSuite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic aperitifs; non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; waters beverages; mineral and aerated waters; isotonic beverages; whey beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails; orgeat, namely, an orange and almond flavored syrup used for making beverages; beer; powders for making effervescing beverages in the nature of soft drinks; pastilles for effervescing beverages, namely, powders in pellet form used to make soft drinks; syrups for beverages; must; preparations for making aerated water; preparations for making mineral water; sherbets beverages; essences for making non-alcoholic beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, except beer; distilled beverages, namely, distilled spirits; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; anise liqueur; aperitifs; arak and arrack; brandy; wine; whisky; kirsch; vodka; alcoholic bitters; perry; gin; prepared alcoholic cocktails; curacao liqueur; liqueurs; hydromel mead; peppermint liqueurs; spirits beverages; piquette; rum; sake; hard cider; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic essences | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "Tsareff" Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by "Tsareff" Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by "Tsareff" Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named GREEN VALLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 25, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |