USPTO serial 79111074
CORN THINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORN THINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 THIRD AVENUE8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Crispbread slices predominantly of corn | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CTDV | CT DECISION: VACATED AND REMANDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |