Drawing for DIGISTAR

USPTO serial 79111450

DIGISTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4270366Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2013
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGISTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaPO Box 230692New York, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Lighting ballastsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Lamp reflectors; Lighting equipment, namely, electric lighting fixtures, lamps, light bulbs and structural parts therefore for use in horticultural lighting applications; cultivation lamps and parts thereof, namely, high pressure sodium (HPS), metal halide, plasma, and light emitting diode (LED)SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 31, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 9, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 9, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 8, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 3, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 8, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 10, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 2, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance